[yellow shrugs, smiling]
What’s wrong with russian roulette?
I played it once and didn’t die
[yellow is now smiling harder, in a creepy way, gun in hand]
That must mean it’s safe
[yellow shrugs, smiling]
What’s wrong with russian roulette?
I played it once and didn’t die
[yellow is now smiling harder, in a creepy way, gun in hand]
That must mean it’s safe
Oh, so you can’t proofread your comments when saying I can’t proofread mine?
To be clear, I can.
I just can’t be arsed most of the time. I write on mobile and go for speed over accuracy on Lemmy
So we should take care to only be subbed to the best and official community on the Fediverse, and none other?
And you don’t see how that’s rhetorically ridiculous if your aim is to have Lemmy grow and be unlike Reddit?
Clearly you don’t go for quality either.
I guess so. You definitely shouldn’t be capable of tolerating seeing the same post twice without crashing entirely out. That would be reasonable. And less entertaining for me personally.
The best method to grow Lemmy is wholly irrelevant to the fact that OP is objectively not spamming. They posted their comic exactly once in each relevant community.
Edit to add: maybe Lemmy would be more capable of growing if we didn’t have the most insufferable user base on any social media platform on the internet
Rhetorical quality and proofreading aren’t in the same category. For you to not understand that suggests a slight lack of understanding about what “rhetoric” actually means.
“Crashing out”? Oh we’re doing strawmen? Okay. So let me adjust… Got it.
Okay, so someone posting 1000000000 times in a second is a reasonable topic of calm criticism.
Long texts don’t mean heated moods. In fact, I’ve noted that usually the ones who are really heated moods have really a very hard time indeeed saying more than a few simple words like this guy:
You can’t say OP isn’t objectively spamming, because he posted something that was on my frontpage of all several times in a row. Not twice. More.
Had he waited even an hour between those, it would’ve not been subjectively spammy to me.
Homework: Learn the meanings and differences between “subjective” and "objective
Friend, this thread has like 100 comments in it and you make up like half of them. You are crashing out. You’ve posted that screenshot like 5 times as many times as OP posted their comic. You made ten copies of the same inane reply to the same comment as if that was in any way analagous to OP posting their comic multiple times in multiple different communities.
Get help
At the time of this edit, this thread has 116 comment, 58 of which are this user. Legendary crashout
“You’re crashing out because I don’t like what you say and you’ve written more than a couple of socially inept kids.”
Yeah pardon me for trusting my therapist with an actual psychology Ph.D (actually a couple, technically, seeing how he had to recertify to several countries) more for what’s" crashing out".
I like to write. So what? As a lot of kids arguing me have noted, they don’t like to read. “didn’t read, lol”. So what the fuck are you doing on a forum complaining someone has too much output?
Ofc it’s analogous. The only way ot wouldn’t be if one was stupid enough to think this was Reddit and that posts you make aren’t overwhelmingly seen by the community as a whole, subscribed or not. I’m pretending to be as dumb as you are pretending to be.
“Get help”.
For what, you being illiterate and dumb? No, I don’t get help. I am the help.
Edit can’t help but add this gif, totally forgot and one of you would mockingly post it if I didn’t do it first.
I’m making you mad enough to actually put in some fucking effort, unlike the other three-four clowns from today who couldn’t even manage half the level of rhetoric you can. So congrats, today you’re the king of the swingers, the jungle VIP.
And oh how I love how Lemmy pretends being so progressive and lefty up until you have a personal clash and then you can’t wait to imply that anyone who actually has a therapist or is improving themselves should “get help” and other “you’re crazy and thus not to be believed” implications. Not great rhetoric, kiddo.