GrapheneOS’s propaganda about every android ROM being insecure except their’s seems to working.
Nothing is 100% safe. There are varying degrees. GrapheneOS can be exploited just “the most secure phone OS” that is supposedly iOS.
If attestation is wrong and GrapheneOS is slamming another group for making an attestation system but GrapheneOS has its own attestation, doesn’t that seem a bit hypocritical?
GrapheneOS’s propaganda about every android ROM being insecure except their’s seems to working.
Nothing is 100% safe. There are varying degrees. GrapheneOS can be exploited just “the most secure phone OS” that is supposedly iOS.
If attestation is wrong and GrapheneOS is slamming another group for making an attestation system but GrapheneOS has its own attestation, doesn’t that seem a bit hypocritical?
They complain about /e/ and Sailfish because they are genuinely bad. You can see how bad /e/ is in my recent post.
They used to support DivestOS which was an OS designed for phones which don’t support Graphene.