• ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I’m kind of torn on this, because on the one side I can see the developer’s troubles. If they have 30 years of experience and they considered the impact of using it they will most likely know how to use it properly and ethically. Indeed many of the issues people have with AI are a kind of redirected anger, when really they are issues with capitalism, incompetency, or digital illiteracy. And the person posting the issue seems purely there to fan that flame rather than actually contribute. Something maintainers could use just as little as slop authored PRs.

    But on the other hand, being open about the usage is a must. It’s the price to pay for going against the grain. If your ideals and means are pure, they should be defendable and scrutinizable to reasonable people, and there should be no issue with that in the long term. Hiding the usage will create doubt about authorship, and make defenses harder to point at, while it won’t stop the horde.

    • lama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah what rubs me wrong is that they went out of their way to hide it and are proud of it

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      It’s at times like this I like to point out examples like surgeons Ben Carr(?) and Dr. Oz as counter examples that you can be very knowledgeable about something but also very unwise or morally bankrupt it simultaneously.