Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoWell that's a reviewlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1197
arrow-up1197imageWell that's a reviewlemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-square🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up125·3 days agoGender affirming care for cis people seems to be accepted way more easily.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 day ago Gender affirming care for ultra-rich. Fixed that for you.
minus-squareOnomatopoeia@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·3 days agoHahahahahaja No, no, this isn’t “accepted”, she has money.
minus-squareCarbonIceDragon@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up56·3 days agoI mean, it accepted in the sense that entire governments aren’t trying to forbid her from using public bathrooms over it.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 day agoThat’s because she has money.
minus-squareEarthman_Jim@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 hours agoNope. You’re missing some key social dynamics in your assessment.
Gender affirming care for cis people seems to be accepted way more easily.
Fixed that for you.
Hahahahahaja
No, no, this isn’t “accepted”, she has money.
I mean, it accepted in the sense that entire governments aren’t trying to forbid her from using public bathrooms over it.
That’s because she has money.
Nope.
You’re missing some key social dynamics in your assessment.