A user asked on the official Lutris GitHub two weeks ago “is lutris slop now” and noted an increasing amount of “LLM generated commits”. To which the Lutris creator replied:
It’s only slop if you don’t know what you’re doing and/or are using low quality tools. But I have over 30 years of programming experience and use the best tool currently available. It was tremendously helpful in helping me catch up with everything I wasn’t able to do last year because of health issues / depression.
There are massive issues with AI tech, but those are caused by our current capitalist culture, not the tools themselves. In many ways, it couldn’t have been implemented in a worse way but it was AI that bought all the RAM, it was OpenAI. It was not AI that stole copyrighted content, it was Facebook. It wasn’t AI that laid off thousands of employees, it’s deluded executives who don’t understand that this tool is an augmentation, not a replacement for humans.
I’m not a big fan of having to pay a monthly sub to Anthropic, I don’t like depending on cloud services. But a few months ago (and I was pretty much at my lowest back then, barely able to do anything), I realized that this stuff was starting to do a competent job and was very valuable. And at least I’m not paying Google, Facebook, OpenAI or some company that cooperates with the US army.
Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not. Whether or not I use Claude is not going to change society, this requires changes at a deeper level, and we all know that nothing is going to improve with the current US administration.
These AI people are so delusional. They contradict themselves immediately.
Then you don’t need AI.
??? The common denominator is AI. By using it you are part of the problem. All mainstream AI is trained on stolen data.
Then don’t?
The “tools” require large amounts of storage, RAM, electricity, water etc etc. The only tool is the end user.
So they are just an asshole and their excuse finding is just irrelevant.
This guy is maintaining that huge project for an eternity in his free time, but entitled hypocrits like you have audacity to call him an asshole. No one needs your recommendations. Even if you have experience to maintain and develop a project for 16 years and your brain is capable to keep everything in the context, and type hundreds of lines manually for the most tedious tasks—good for you, but there are different people with different brains. AI helpers with proper tooling is a good instrument in hands of a good engineer. They are basically better autocomplete and searching tools, and they are amazing ‘rubber duck’ companions making coding process psychologically easier if you stressed, anxious, or depressed, but need the job to be done. If you think what you’re doing, you won’t produce slop whatever instrument you use, if not—you’ll write slop without AI.
When bubble pops soon, AI have to become sustainable economically and ecologically. Same happened during the dotcom bubble.
So, either help the project, or leave opensource devs alone
Nobody is beyond reproach, and nobody gets free passes, especially with the flagrant attitude they’ve shown toward concerns and criticism.
Yeah, you can be glad this guy is putting in his hours and life into a free project but still be upset by the decisions he makes. I get not harassing him but we aren’t allowed to critique people either? Especially for an app that is widely used.
Sure, but your opinion of them doesn’t really matter all that much. You’re acting like your judgment is somehow important to anything. But that’s not really true, now is it?
If the opinion of the public is as inconsequential as you think, then you have no reason to engage with it at all.
So you’re going to stop?
What? Why??
Because current AI products attract huge investments and do not pay off at all. Basically they companies have unlimited money, and spend them on building huge data centres and facilities. But as soon as finding will run out, they have to moderate appetites. Many companies will flop and go bankrupt or just switch to something else. Cheap and local LLMs with high efficiency/cost rate should be dominant, as they won’t need so much infrastructure to support. Kinda similar was during dotcom bubble, but average person didn’t knew and care about ecology and ethics so much as nowadays.
That’s why I hate when “morally impeccable” people find an easy target, make it a scapegoat, and bully them online.
If it upsets you then fork it
Yeah, how is the insane water consumption a capitalism problem? Do China’s datacenters not need water?
China is a capitalist country. It’s still a capitalist problem.