• Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Great, how much money was wasted on this thing that’s not an essential part of a 100% standards-compliant browser?

    Because that’s what Firefox needs to be. That’s all it should ever have been.

    • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      So you want a browser nobody uses?

      Or do you want a browser with a good ux? Because this is part of a good ux.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        As long as it’s driven by open standards and not DoubleClick’s monetization plans, I’m of the mindset that either the users will find it, or else those who care need to build a new and different network that’s actively toxic to advertising.

        UX is a secondary concern after decrapifying the engine and the browser and making the browser an actual user agent, rather than a virtual machine. Possibly even tertiary.