• zach@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 天前

    I believe the last time something like this came up, the argument was raised that it normalizes the behavior and leads to escalation, i.e. “they’re just illustrations” “it’s just a doll” to “I’m just taking photos” or “it’s just touching”, this time against actual victims

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 小时前

        Fake kids to real kids is very different than some crazy fucko thinking same-sex marriage would lead to fucking animals. Are you for real?

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      Slippery slope fallacy. We know that consumption of real CSAM might increase frustration and lead to pursuit of real crimes. However, we don’t have the same level of evidence for illustrations or sex dolls. It’s a massive blind side in the scientific literature. It’s very hard to study.

      Despite this, the number one risk factor still remains unsupervised access to minors. Regardless of whether the abuser consumes abuse media or not.