• Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s not the problem. Lack of labels is. You need to have a cable tester to figure out which one of your many C-C cables is best for a particular purpose.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That is a solution. Haven’t really seen any comprehensive labels that would clearly indicate all the capabilities of the cable. Maybe there’s a thunderbolt logo, maybe 100W is written on it? If you’re lucky. Definitely can’t have both at the same time though. I guess that leaves me with approximately zero cables I’ll be buying in the future.

        Have a look at this for instance. If a charger manufacturer can’t be bothered to put any useful labels on the cables, what do you think anyone else will do?

        It’s a 60 W cable, so how about you write 60 W on it, so that the people who bought your 100 W charger won’t be disappointed? Too much effort, I guess.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s a 60 W cable, so how about you write 60 W on it

          Why did my house burn down, I only put 60w of 5v through the 60w cable?

          • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Because you bypassed the PD chip. With great current comes great responsibility.

            While you’re at it, consider dropping to just 100 mV and keeping the power at 60 W to see what happens. Should be interesting.