• carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 个月前

    The reason to eliminate door handles that Tesla and others typically give is aerodynamic efficiency. Granted there are other bigger aerodynamic problems. gestures at the rest of the fucking truck

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 个月前

      That’s just nonsense justification they came up with after the fact. Ferraris have door handles, so clearly they’re not much of an issue.

      Anyway the car isn’t going to exceed 80 miles an hour anyways so aerodynamics barely comes into it.

    • datendefekt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 个月前

      The improvement removing the handles is there, but negligible. Especially considering the safety implications. Didn’t China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 个月前

        Didn’t China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?

        Yeah, but that literally just happened last month and doesn’t take effect until January 2027. It’s not like they did that years ago because they saw it coming.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      Aerodynamics was obviously not a concern in the process of designing a vehicle that has (checks notes) literal corners.