• Redkey@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    I sympathize with the point of the article, but if someone’s seriously citing Flash, which had widespread success for a run of about 15 years before being overtaken by later developments (driven in part by a billionaire with an axe to grind), as a short-lived “dead end” that was best avoided, then how long do they think is a sensible amount of time to wait to see if something’s worth spending time and effort? Nothing remains on top forever.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well, I’m still waiting for that new language everyone is talking about to mature enough for being really useful, it’s not even 50 years old yet, that C++ lang