• slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or people realise it’s the thin edge of the wedge.

    Look how much governments abuse data retention for law enforcement when the reason for storing the data is not for law enforcement.

    If the functionality is already in the system then what is stopping more governments requiring it or expanding it.

    • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      If the functionality is already in the system then what is stopping more governments requiring it or expanding it.

      Because having direct access to your system is something that would be incompatible with the constitution of most civilized countries and would therefore require massive legislative change. If a government is planning to do that, an additional field in systemd won’t be the change that tips the scales.

      • RedWedding@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah sure, direct access to my system is unconstitutional. But bombing places for oil and slavery in prisons isn’t. Nobody in power cares about your constitution. Be happy that your civilized constitutional country takes care about all these terrorists in the middle east lol.

        /RANT