A jury has found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors by deliberately driving down Twitter’s stock price in the tumultuous months leading up to his 2022 acquisition of the social media company for $44 billion. But it absolved him of some fraud allegations, finding that he did not “scheme” to mislead investors.

  • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Considering he’s made $400B since acquiring Twitter, this was just a minor cost of doing business.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I could change the world for the better with this sum. Hell, even with the fee. Oh well, I’m sure it’s best that he has that money 🙄🤮.

    • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Considering he’s made $400B since acquiring Twitter…

      Serious question: How?

      AFAIK, Twitter wasn’t terribly profitable before they sold to Musk. Then after he purchased it, the enshittification accelerated.

      How on earth does this result in $400 Billions in profit?!?

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        He made $400B, not Twitter. That’s almost entirely from Tesla and other ventures, not Twitter.

        Last I’ve been able to find Twitter was valued at $33B when xAI bought it. But that was clearly an overvalued sale. Just look at the valuation over time.

        And that’s just raw valuation which is easily manipulated, not revenue or profit, which can be easily manipulated.

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s not real money, and Musk isn’t the richest person in truth, not by a long shot. This is theoretical money based on overpriced companies that are propped up by what I suspect are some rather shady practices and investors using it as a casino stock.

        • theolodis@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The money doesn’t have to be real for Elon to be able to use his stock as collateral for billion dollar loans. So he in fact has real money, that banks gave him, and that he will never pay back.

            • theolodis@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              It will only restrict his ability to get new loans, and make his collaterals worthless. But he probably spent most of the money they gave him, and like with twitter, he shifted the assets around in his network of companies, like a thimblerigger.

              But that’s kind of like saying that inflation will make the rich poor, which is also not true.

              • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                When stocks crash, his loans that are backed by those stocks get margin called, and he will have to sell other stock. If the government didn’t bail him out, and they will so this is academic, although he will have to pay them bribes secretly obviously that goes without saying, he would see a cascading effect from a recession because his companies are all so overpriced.

        • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Actually worst than imaginable if you delve deep the psychology of the rich is akin to tumour development. Never forget these rich fuckheads would bet over your misery like a game.