• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Mine started with ST5, which you had to translate into the number, which was 785. Even as a kid, I knew it was weird. Nobody could ever explain that old tradition of having the letters. Don’t give me a phone number with a combination of letters and numbers, just give me the numbers. Why you got to make a simple thing harder?

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was a holdover from when you had to make a verbal request to the telephone operator to connect a call, rather than use a dial. Kind of odd that nobody could explain it.

      Wikipedia Link

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Kind of odd that nobody could explain it.

        Did you read the Wikipedia entry you linked? The explanation is incredibly convoluted. No wonder nobody can explain it. I just read it, and I couldn’t explain it to someone. It seems like the reasons were logical when it started, but when I had that number in the 60s, making a call was essentially the same as today (except no push buttons), and there was no reason to keep up with those two letters at the beginning. It was just a holdover from the olden days, like Daylight Savings time. We tend to be reluctant to give up old traditions, no matter how pointless they are.

        • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I found it easy to understand. The last manual exchange in the US was replaced by automatic switching in the 1970’s, so the reason for the letters is still within living memory for some people. I thought that people who’d used the old system would be able to explain the reason for the letters easily.