• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    11 hours ago

    brokenglasszero
    last week
    It’s one thing to decide to use AI tools and such for the work you’re doing. You can do that, and I don’t have to like it and both are fine. The real painful thing about this is “Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.”

    Because you’ve decided to do this, we can’t even fork it and we have no idea if we’re even adhering to the license properly, no idea where the code came from, etc… You’ve basically poisoned the Lutris source code to spite everyone and it feels incredibly against the entire spirit of what open source should be. It’s frustrating to seeing a project I really enjoyed taking a turn like this, far more so than the usage of AI alone.