• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Wow, that’s a lot more complicated than I would have expected!

    This happens a lot in the USA, because of how much autonomy the states have. A lot of decisions are left up to individual states, and some states end up doing strange things and add all sorts of exceptions to their laws. Even basic things like sick leave aren’t federally mandated (and only 19 or so out of the 50 states have mandated paid sick leave).

    Sometimes it can be a good thing though… For example, California has the strictest privacy laws in the country (CCPA and CPRA, similar to GDPR in Europe), and Illinois has very strict laws on usage of biometrics (like fingerprints and facial recognition). Those would have been extremely hard to approve nationwide. Things that go well in one state often end up rolling out to other states too.

    • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Dont hold up California as a good example of privacy when they’re leading the charge in demanding OS level age verification…

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s not perfect, and I don’t like the OS-level age verification, but in terms of privacy it’s still far better than most other jurisdictions.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        By that same logic don’t hold Europe up as a good example of privacy either despite the gdpr.

        Like are you actually that stupid? Californias age verification thing is annoying yes, but cali is still one of the prime example of digital privacy and consumer protections in the world.

        No where’s perfect for fuck sake. You can’t just ignore all the good cause one thing that hasn’t even happened yet could possibly be bad.