• jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yeah, that could be some of it. We can’t all be perfect all the time. It’s impossible.

    I’d appreciate more honest appraisals, though. “I know Twitter is garbage run by a Nazi, but I got linked to it and scrolled a bit” is far better than “well other people are worse so who cares”. There’s this childish whataboutism that a lot of people bring out to justify their poor behavior.

    • pmk@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I agree, honesty is a good first step. So, given all this, should we focus on simply being the more attractive option? Or a combination of principles and convenience? If the good option is cheaper or more convenient, we wouldn’t strictly need principles and moral arguments. I’m just thinking of strategy here, it can feel good to be a righteous preacher, but what actually gets us the results we want?

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t know. A coworker years ago said to me “you have to make what you want people to do the easy thing”, and I think he was right. But someone still has to do work. Back then, it was me changing the deploy script to automatically run tests and open the report so people had to go out of their way to skip all that.

        I’m not sure what that looks like for the fediverse. Linking them directly? Some sort of “sign up with Google” SSO mechanism? Just make the account for your friend and give it to them?

        Ideally we’d go up one level and address why people are so mentally depleted they can’t handle a sign up form.