• lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It is literally for the act of verifying a users age.

    Being the verifier instead of the requester doesn’t make it not age verification. It’s part and parcel.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I just don’t see how it’s any different than my Sony PSP having an optional birthday field. Or oldschool forums having one. It can’t possibly affect me, or anyone who’s concerned about it.

      If systemd starts talking about bundling face scanners or whatever they actually need to verify someone’s age, and then tons of linux systems start requiring it, then I will be gravely concerned.

      • sonofearth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        it’s optional now but can be mandatory later? It literally takes a baby monkey’s brain to understand that.

        Also this is literally in the PR:

        Stores the user’s birth date for AGE VERIFICATION, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.