• Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    And then expand in the further discussion that the field has further use besides compliance, and that even if it complies that a field that you can control whenever is not real verification. Please don’t be a headline Andy. I’ve also been one, but if I’m to dive in comments and write about it I usually give it a read, specially if I reference the content of the post.

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m not a headline Andy. They literally said, in the PR, that it was also to address these laws. It is not a slippery slope fallacy when they’re citing it as a reason. It’s part of the fucking motivation. It’s part of the reason it exists in the first place.

      Just because you are too young/naive to understand how this kind of shit turns over in the real world, and/or too illiterate to read PR comments, doesn’t magically make all the people upset about it alarmists.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        Yeah, they said that. But I’ll just quote myself.

        And then expand in the further discussion that the field has further use besides compliance, and that even if it complies that a field that you can control whenever is not real verification.

        They commented that besides compliance, the field has its uses. If for you the initial motivation completely undermines the usefulness of a tool or thing, because that’s what you are doing right now, then nothing else to comment.

        Holy shit you are angry, no need to insult when you didn’t process my comment. No point in responding further if you are not gonna be civil. Cya.