Add a required birth date prompt (YYYY-MM-DD) to the user creation flow, stored as a systemd userdb JSON drop-in at /etc/userdb/<user>.user on the target system.

Motivation

Recent age verification laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc. require platforms to verify user age. Collecting birth date at install time ensures Arch Linux is compliant with these regulations.

This is just a pull request, no changes yet.

The pull-request discussion thread has been locked, just like it happened for the similar thread in Systemd, owing to the amount of negative comments…

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The thing that’s frustrating is that if the age verification laws weren’t there and they wanted to add a birthday field it wouldn’t seem bad. Details about the human using the account like first and last name are already stored. All you really need is username. But because it’s explicitly in reaction to age verification laws we have to be skeptical about adding it.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The timing makes me even more suspicious. Of all the times one could added this field, this is probably singularly the worst one. Right after discussions of mandatory age check? Seriously?

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        You don’t need to be suspicious, they’re explicitly adding it because of that. They said as much. Look at what they wrote under “Motivation.”

        • Avicenna@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          35 minutes ago

          I sort of get the feeling of something more than just complying with the possible future age verification law. I feel like it has intent do damage and distrupt the community.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 minutes ago

            I feel this law has the intent to damage and disrupt things in general, yes. Parental controls have existed for ages but lawmakers don’t seem interested in them. For example, all the porn bans, rather than forcing sites to use some sort of self tagging system that parental controls could easily see (like some response header) they just want them to take IDs. All of it is a push to forcing people to always be online transparently with their real identity well known.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You’re saying that in a post age verification world though, my whole point is that if this were there before it wouldn’t seem bad. I’m not saying we should add it now because it would’ve been fine before.