cm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 2 months agoUK iPhone users face over-18 age check to use services after updatewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up165cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up165external-linkUK iPhone users face over-18 age check to use services after updatewww.theguardian.comcm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoApple pretended to stand up to them a couple times in high-profile cases for optics. They were helping them all along.
minus-squareLytia @lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoThere is, AFAIK, zero proof to back up your claim.
minus-squareXLE@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoEven if true, I think I prefer when Apple was normalizing standing up to surveillance, instead of being the first to endorse it.
minus-squareLytia @lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoYeah, I agree. I just wanted to call them out because FUD has never once helped the privacy community, and I’m tired of people strawmanning big tech and making the comm look bad.
Apple pretended to stand up to them a couple times in high-profile cases for optics. They were helping them all along.
There is, AFAIK, zero proof to back up your claim.
Even if true, I think I prefer when Apple was normalizing standing up to surveillance, instead of being the first to endorse it.
Yeah, I agree. I just wanted to call them out because FUD has never once helped the privacy community, and I’m tired of people strawmanning big tech and making the comm look bad.
deleted by creator