Over the past couple weeks, there’s been a lot of discussion around Lutris and its developer, Mathieu Comandon, following comments about using AI tools (specifically Claude) as part of the project’s development.
It’s the kind of topic that can very quickly spiral into wider debates about open
deleted by creator
IMO, Lutris was already an overrated pile of junk before genAI became popular. It tracks that they’re vibecoding it now.
You’re kidding? Or did he really wrote that?
deleted by creator
Wait, that is completely different from what you said earlier.
“if you don’t tell Claude, it will override your change”
Agentic tools do this today.
imagine this, if you set a goal for a robot to build a 9th storeys building, later you interject mid way to build up to 15 storeys. When the robot resumes its task, of course the robot is going to destroy the higher floors to meet its original goal of building to 9th storeys.
what else should we expect here?
the right to do before hitting the resume button is to “communicate” this new intention again.
it is not about being afraid of things
I read it as “while Claude is actively working on this particular file, I do not touch that file”.
deleted by creator
yeah that was fucking wild. although I am anti-ai, I do make a distinction between vibeshitting and using the thing as a boilerplate helper; what he said there should make anyone squeamish about letting this thing loose on your home folder.