Barbuzie@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 7 hours agoShe does like itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1314
arrow-up1314imageShe does like itlemmy.worldBarbuzie@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 7 hours agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareilovesaggytits:) @lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 hours agoHow would you frame a sentence here for velocity then?
minus-squareLili_Thana@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoVelocity is speed and direction. So “16.4 mph north” is sufficient.
minus-squareTigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·42 minutes agoIt is not. It’s not in metric.
minus-squareji59@hilariouschaos.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 hours ago16.4 MPH in that direction?
minus-squarestatic09@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 hours agoI find the absurdity of the joke would be better if the mother asked, “In which direction?”
minus-squareByteJunk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoTo explain this joke: velocity is a vector quantity, so it has a magnitude (speed) and a direction, which mom failed to indicate, shame on her.
That is speed
How would you frame a sentence here for velocity then?
Velocity is speed and direction. So “16.4 mph north” is sufficient.
It is not. It’s not in metric.
16.4 MPH in that direction?
I find the absurdity of the joke would be better if the mother asked, “In which direction?”
To explain this joke: velocity is a vector quantity, so it has a magnitude (speed) and a direction, which mom failed to indicate, shame on her.