• curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Multiple clusters. You dont necessarily want all your nodes on a single cluster, and in the enterprise you often don’t.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            For us it was more of a liability than anything. We didn’t use any of the high availability features, and every time we needed to remove and readd a host it was a massive pain in the ass and usually broke more things. It was nice for migrating VMs around, but we don’t do that all THAT often.

            I’m curious if this datacenter will handle our shitty hosts spontaneously dying and needing to be rebuilt better.

            • ikidd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              This seems like a PEBCAK issue. This isn’t going to help anything if you aren’t even using clusters.

            • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              HA is pretty much the point - and I can’t see any enterprise running without it. Maybe small, but nothing mid or large size. A sector Proxmox can get into at least in small scale (seeing this now actually), and grow.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        And if you’re a cloud service provider, you want to be able to separate your tenants, but still manage all of them.