• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    There has to be some interesting history here.

    A few other examples have been posted, but this is easily the wildest. It’s not even the same aspect ratio of grid, or at a normal angle to the rest, or over a very significant area. (And they’ve still managed to tie it in reasonably well)

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think that area was built when nothing else was there, without the developer thinking too hard about its orientation.

      As time went on, new development started nearby, oriented to a different geographic element, like a shoreline, or a river, etc. eventually that development met the old development, and they were lined up differently, and the municipality stuck with the new grid system orientation and just built around the old one.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      To me what’s wild about it is that it’s completely filled with houses, and the houses seem to all respect the orientation of the nearest street.

      You’d think that they’d say “Ok, well in this section we have these two roads coming at a narrow angle, let’s just make this a park”, or something to make the places where the two grids join a little less ugly.