• zloubida@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4時間前

    The expression “cheetahs run fast” is true, even if a slow cheetah, for example a wounded cheetah, is still a cheetah. Thus, the expression “men are trash” is true, even if a non-trashy man is still a man. The insistence on saying “not all men” every time someone says “men are trash” is just a new demonstration of the problem.

    (I’m a cis man myself, BTW.)

    Edit: this article explains it better than I could.

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4時間前

        Maybe. But an analogy can be rightly used or wrongly used. Racism use this analogy to speak about genetics, biology, to spead hatred; feminism use this analogy to make changes in men and manhood, and spread respect. The difference is essential.

    • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2時間前

      What percentage of a group needs to be considered trash in order for the whole group to be called trash?

      Every group has trash people. Is every group trash? Are all women trash too?

      If I met a woman who was trash, and then went online and said “women are trash”, would that be acceptable?

      What if I happen to live in a place where I’m surrounded by trash women unproportionally, would it be okay for me to declare all women as trash, because that’s all I have ever met?

      Where do you draw the line? How do you measure when enough people in the group become trash, so that it’s okay to call the whole group trash?