• quips@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      No entire group of people is trash. This is the same thinking behind misogyny and racism, and is the exact kind of speech that breeds incels.

      • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        One could understand “men are trash” as having the meaning “every single man is trash”, which would be in line with racism as you say. Or one could understand it as “the group overall is trash”, meaning any individual member isn’t necessarily trash.

        The latter meaning is in some senses a matter of data - men are extremely overrepresented in e.g. violent crimes.

        Which, again, doesn’t much about the individual man.

          • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Because of the current cultural context, yes. Even when you add “overall.” But I’d be completely open to you elucidating that you are referring to some non-racist point.

            If there’s been a history of people stating this about a group meaning every single member, then you need to assume that’s what they mean. I don’t think that’s the case with men.

            Not saying one meaning must be assumed over the other, you’ll have to depend on cultural context to understand the deeper meaning.

            Compare for example “men can’t give birth” vs. “men love sports”. The former clearly intends to say “all men”, the latter intends “the group overall”.

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        53 minutes ago

        The expression “cheetahs run fast” is true, even if a slow cheetah, for example a wounded cheetah, is still a cheetah. Thus, the expression “men are trash” is true, even if a non-trashy man is still a man. The insistence on saying “not all men” every time someone says “men are trash” is just a new demonstration of the problem.

        (I’m a cis man myself, BTW.)

        Edit: this article explains it better than I could.

          • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            Maybe. But an analogy can be rightly used or wrongly used. Racism use this analogy to speak about genetics, biology, to spead hatred; feminism use this analogy to make changes in men and manhood, and spread respect. The difference is essential.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If you read that from this meme, you might need to go back to school to learn some literacy a bit more.

        • quips@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          And we are talking about men from nearly 100 years ago. I think a lot of progress has been made.

          My point is thats besides the point. Generalizing the negative nature of an entire group of people is what the nazis did, what the imperial japanese did, what racists do, what rapists do, what homopbobes and transphobes do. You can call out misogyny without aligning your behavior with these horrible people, who’s behaving like this is exactly what brought about this kind of mistreatment in the first place.

  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s not why she died. She died because she was incompetent. She was a bad pilot and after a crash the man that was the radio expert quit. She didn’t know how to work the radios and broadcasted to listen on a channel that her radio couldn’t use, she didn’t know how to use the trailing antenna that could have saved them so she had it removed, etc…

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This. If she knew how to use her equipment and bothered to learn Morse Code, the best fail-safe of the time, she would have probably been fine. Instead she made a heap of stupid mistakes that cost her life.

  • Cort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They were listening on the frequencies she told them to listen on. How could they have known she didn’t know which antenna to broadcast on?

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 hours ago

      To put things in context, this is what they used for communication between a tank and its commanders in WWI:

      A tank with a pigeon being released from a hatch.

      When the Titanic sunk in 1912, they had a telegraph on board, but no voice radio.

      In the 1920s radio took off as a one-way broadcaster to receiver technology, but it still was only rarely used as two-way communications. That only really started for communications between ships in WWII.

      So, although she didn’t know how to use the radio in her plane, it was mostly because radio communication was a brand new thing. I’m sure what they put in her plane wasn’t some off-the-shelf radio that had standard switches, antennas and parts. It was probably cobbled together from various parts and only the truly tech-oriented people understood it.

      • axh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Her radio wasn’t off-the-shelf hardware. But I bet that her plane wasn’t either. What she tried to do required much more effort and knowledge than just operating off-the-shelf tools.

        What I am trying to say is that she wasn’t stupid, she was just not prepared enough for the task.

      • jafra@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Doesn’t matter why she wasn’t able to handle her communication tec, she did not die because of male ignorance. If anything it was her ignorance for not learning how to use her equipment

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Only if you ignore most of the facts about the situation that got her killed, if i recall correctly the mission was a bit rushed, there were some miscommunication, and for some reason her radio wasn’t able to receive from the ship that she was supposed to meet up with, so the ship could hear her but she couldn’t hear them, and thus she couldn’t locate the ship

  • TouchMacaque@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If you play the triangle in the Bermuda triangle everyone who’s ever died there comes back to life, but with a catch. All the men have Jenkem filled balls and all the women have smegma filled tits. That’s why no one has ever done it, no one wants hundreds of disgusting abominations risen from the dead.

    There’s one exception to this though, a weird Christian cult in the 1970s believe that when Jesus resurrected and escaped from his tomb he actually walked on water all the way to the Bermuda triangle where he died for realsies. The cult members all made a pilgrimage there to play the triangle to resurrect him again but they all died.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      no one wants hundreds of disgusting abominations risen from the dead.

      Uhhhhh, hold on. I need to buy a cruise ship ticket, and bring a triangle! I absolutely want to bring a swarm of human killing zombies to life. Also, I need the cruise ship to be empty besides me, and crew. We need the space to bring all the zombies aboard, and then bring them all to America. Where they’ll be free to kill all the humans.

      Yes. I absolutely DO want this! Booking cruise ship now.