• RuBisCO@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    That sounds like a mod problem, and plagiarism is not an acceptable recourse.
    Regardless of mod behavior, this post is about supporting artists and not treating their signatures (for lack of a better term) as ads to be removed.

    • ozymandias@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I was being facetious
      But I had a picture from election truth alliance removed because it had their website on the bottom…
      They’re a non-profit, not spam.
      I don’t remove attribution from stuff I share, unless it’s really big and has the twitter/Instagram/etc logos all over it… Sometimes it really is an ad.
      This is the picture that was removed, btw:.

      • RuBisCO@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Ahh, that makes more sense. I must admit, sometimes I do eat the onion.
        Yeah, I agree that looks more like data than spam, and social media sites aren’t artists.

        • ozymandias@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          well that’s why the /s tag was invented… I just feel like it loses something if I label it…
          SIKE!
          NOT!
          (only 90’s kids will get that one)