• homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    7 小时前

    This architectural style is called, no kidding, Soviet Brutalism, and was the primary architectural style featured in the Soviet Union from the 1950s to the 1980s.

    It’s a divergence from Western brutalism, focusing more on utopian and futuristic themes.

    So, no, it’s not anything political. It’s a cultural thing.

    Boston City Hall, for example:

    The campus of the Rochester Institute of Technology, a.k.a. “Brick City”:

    • Sem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 小时前

      I would say “socialist modernism”, not " soviet brutalism". Because there are a lot of examples not from ex USSR.

      This is Belgrade, Serbia (ex-Yugoslavia):

      Museum of Modern Arts:

      Hotel “Yugoslavija”:

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 小时前

        You should check the link I posted. Honolulu has a crapton of brutalism, so I wouldn’t associate it necessarily with any political movement.

        I think where brutalism exists now is more a function of when an area was being developed, and it just happens that those areas underwent substantial development while brutalism was en vogue (late 50’s - late 1970s).

    • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 小时前

      was the primary architectural style featured in the Soviet Union from the 1950s to the 1980s.

      It wasn’t so much a “style” as what happens when you can only afford to build projects in rubles.