Recently saw a youtube video about a service created to change an open source software license.
- One agent reads code and gather specs
- Another agent, without access to the original code, creates equivalent software
In theory this should allow someone to take any open source software and change it’s license.
For a large portion of open source likely this is not an issue, because nobody may care for the particular software, but for larger projects I wonder what sort of impact this may have. In particular any open source software where it’s authors are making a living from donations or public support.
Has anyone read, or thought, of a way to prevent getting one’s code license changed this way?
I thought there are some licenses that prohibit cloud providers from using the software and offering it as a service. In those cases even though the software may not be leaving the “Author” machines, it would still be a refactor of software that otherwise the cloud provider would not have been able to run legally under the old license.
sure, but there’s so much community outrage at BSL (and similar) licences, usually because they start as open source and then later rug-pull and relicense community contributions
and this results in there usually being a non-BSL fork of everything that is BSL, or at least a very good (incompatible) alternative
e.g.
but sure, I concede that a clean-room AI-implementation might be valuable depending on the existing licence
I just don’t see this being especially common 🤷