• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 days ago

    That’s a big reduction in VRAM usage, but how much processing power does it take to decompress the textures? It’s worthless if it tanks the frame rate. The lower end GPUs that would benefit the most from this aren’t going to have a lot of processing power to spare.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      You’ve gotta look at the magnitude of difference here, to use a toy example:

      Let’s use a memory data rate of 1GB/s for simple maths

      8GB of uncompressed textures getting moved would take us about 8 seconds

      The compressed stuff at <1GB is going to be done in less than 1 second.

      As long as the decompression process doesn’t take another 7 seconds to complete it’s going to be more performant

      Edit: typo

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          to use a toy example […] for simple maths

          I know, I just picked easy numbers for the sake of discussion. The actual data rate is not important to this particular discussion.

      • 3rdXthecharm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Thanks for the explanation!

        Would you happen to have information about any loss from compression or is that kind of thing negligible with that much time for it to unpack?

        That would just be my only (uninformed) concern. I already fear we’re going too deep in an era of ‘fake’ things, fake frames, fake 4k, fake lighting through strobing to induce less blur for moving objects (that monitor test was sick, but also I fear eye exhaustion will be a thing). My sibling has a card capable of utilizing new frame gen, and that doesn’t look as bad, but it’s still not visually equal to raw same framerate in terms of clarity for me.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          No idea on the loss side of things tbh, though given it’s AI based, I’m assuming it can’t be truly lossless