• yopp@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    5時間前

    This is most unhinged take from both sides.

    Time can’t exist in LLM by design: it’s just a thing that predicts next token based on previous tokens. There is no temporal relation between tokens. You can stop and resume generation at any point. How anyone expect it to “count time”? Based on what? The best you can do is add time mark to model input at some interval.

    Simplifying, somewhat complex biological systems have some kind of clocks that actually chemically tick and induce some kind of signal that they can react on.

    LLMs can’t do that like at all. They never will. Some other architecture that runs in cycles? Maybe. But transformer shit? Never ever.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3時間前

      The issue is that ChatGPT will tell you that it can do those things. Most of the hype for “AI” has been predicated on treating it like actual artificial intelligence and not the LLM parrot it truly is

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3時間前

      I don’t think anybody is expecting an LLM to do it

      what they are expecting is the product, chatGPT, to be a one-stop spot that can do basic tasks like that