• Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I almost forgot that Steam had a need for support.

    In the ~two decades I’ve been using steam, I’ve only contacted support once, to refund a PS2-era PoP, which I bought many months prior, and only spent 20 minutes unsuccessfully trying to get it running on Windows 11.

    I wonder how much more often the average user contacts support than me (which is about 0.00013 times a day)

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Noo valve dont do it. There is nothing to gain and so much to lose

  • recursive_recursion@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Well…just in case here are some alternatives cause I certainly can’t predict what will come of this decision.

    Alternatives


    I’m genuinely really tired of AI being shoved into everything.

    At this point if anyone wants whatever AI/LLMs provide, you do you; I’m not gonna stop you.

    I’m just gonna move on and continue to adapt cause it really seems like it’ll be shoved into anything, (especially things closest to proprietary products/services); without rhyme or reason until morale improves or the bubble collapses.

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Seems like they could be experimenting with an LLM to improve server-side anti-cheat.

    • Sas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      LLM are entirely the wrong tool for that. They’ve used neural nets for their anti cheat for a while but cheating has nothing to do with language so large language models are not for that. They could however use them to police the steam forums but only if a comment gets reported otherwise you’re putting every comment through an llm which would cost a fuckton