• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Why the fuck would any of those organizations still being using Microsoft to begin with?

      • Brummbaer@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I don’t understand why they are signing it. I mean we know that Microsoft is hostile, why submit to their signing bullshit.

        The more you normalise bad behaviour the worse it gets.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Signing it verifies that the software was made by company that it says it was. It’s a method to avoid installing fake or malicious software.

          It is on its face a good thing, with the major caveat being who is in charge of who gets to sign what.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          If its not signed its easier to fake and people would be at risk of installing malicious software. Its Microsofts platform so it needs the Microsoft signature.

          You dont have to sign it, but signing it has benefits. And while Microsoft can revoke it, that doesnt mean they cant still ship the unsigned software.

    • Luci@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      22 hours ago

      My dude. It is literally in the first paragraph of the article.