• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Putting part of the battery in the front, in the crash zone, is going to reduce safety, not improve it.

    One of the main things that improved EV safety over ICE cars is the frunk itself. By removing that massive engine from the front and replacing it with a crumple zone, the car becomes much safer in front impacts.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Do you have a source for that or is it just a conclusion you reached?

      The reason I ask is that I vaguelly remember of seeing somewhere that the way the front of modern ICE cars is designed makes the engine literally fall when a high-speed frontal collision happens exactly so that the front can act as a crumple zone rather than the engine being pushed inside the passenger compartment. That being so, things aren’t quite as simple as you say and I think we need actual real world test results showing that difference in safety rather than mere expectations extrapolated from superficial knowleged about cars.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I looked it up. 2022 IIHS crash tests showed the Tesla model 3 as being much safer in front impacts.

        Modern cars may make the engine fall in a crash, but it’s still better not to have that mass there in the first place. Having said that, the safety advantages of a frunk may be reduced if you have a bunch of heavy cargo in there.