Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 hours agoLinux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreementwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1199cross-posted to: OpenSource@europe.pub
arrow-up1199external-linkLinux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreementwww.tomshardware.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 hours agomessage-square73fedilinkcross-posted to: OpenSource@europe.pub
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 hours agoThis is a bad move. The GPL license cannot be enforced on AI generated code.
minus-squareterabyterex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 hours agoThats not true. The new article being shoved down lemmy’s throat is not correct. They site court cases and come to bad conclusions
minus-squareGoodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoAI generated code cannot be copyrighted, can it? Then it can be relicensed as GPL.
minus-squareeleijeep@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 minutes agoIn order to “license” a work, you need to own the copyright.
This is a bad move. The GPL license cannot be enforced on AI generated code.
Thats not true. The new article being shoved down lemmy’s throat is not correct. They site court cases and come to bad conclusions
AI generated code cannot be copyrighted, can it? Then it can be relicensed as GPL.
In order to “license” a work, you need to own the copyright.