It will comply but will not compile
AI agents MUST NOT add Signed-off-by tags. Only humans can legally certify the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). The human submitter is responsible for:
- Reviewing all AI-generated code
- Ensuring compliance with licensing requirements
- Adding their own Signed-off-by tag to certify the DCO
- Taking full responsibility for the contribution
That’s fair. Nobody has to know you wrote it with a not, that’s impossible to detect, but you have to own it and be ready for the discussions that follow.
@onlinepersona @Innerworld And what do you think, will the AI agent be ready to the following discussion?
Rule-wise, this seems fair.
Regardless, if AI usage continues to increase in this manner, I’ll likely be driving NetBSD, AROS, and FreeDOS by the end of the decade.
Maybe even a little TempleOS or ZealOS, for flavour.
RedoxOS has a no-LLM policy: https://gitlab.redox-os.org/redox-os/redox/-/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#ai-policy
It’s just regarding labeling. It’s unenforcable to have a project “clean” of AI.
It’s just regarding labeling.
No, it’s not: https://old.reddit.com/r/Redox/comments/1rp57nq/redox_os_has_adopted_a_certificate_of_origin/o9ixfu9/?context=1
Ok I see the intent of BDFL is different, but the linked document only mentions labeling - I can only assume the low quality etc. issues are handled as a judgement call, and in that way I consider the “No AI whatsoever” rule unenforceable.
If I use an LLM to generate code under my suprvision, review, quality check and test to be up to standard, how would it be detected I used AI if I don’t label it so? They’ll look for em-dashes in comments?
deleted by creator
Given that nobody is able to guarantee that code used for training was used according to it’s license, this means no hallucinated code in Linux. Nice.
It really has come a long way in a relatively very short time in terms of quality and, well, shitting under the rug
