• BillCheddar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’d pay the $70 or even $100 for a AAA title…if it released complete, relatively bug-free, and didn’t try to soak me with microtransactions and subscriptions.

    But that’s not what’s they’re selling.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is whats wrong with gaming.

      idiots being too eager to throw ever increasing amounts of money at companies, to get what they used to get for 50, with zero self awareness that they are the cancer thats killing everything.

      • early_riser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        Counterpoint: games were more expensive in the past, sometimes even before adjusting for inflation. Goldeneye was $70 new.

        The problem is that back then you bought a complete game to play forever. Now you buy an unfinished mess that despite costing as much, makes it abundantly clear that the game isn’t yours through DRM and in your face micro transactions.

    • SanitationStation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Exactly. AAA is supposed to be pushing the standard forward and compete for my attention by making a better product.

      If i can get an equally good or better game for less money i will obviously go for that.