• chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    18 minutes ago

    Never once in my life have I felt the appeal of gambling.

    All I needed to learn is that statistically, the house comes out ahead, and that was that.

    A friend once insisted on dragging me out to a casino, and I came up with a hare-brained plan for blackjack (since it has the best odds of victory). I decided to double my bet every time until I won. But only up to as much money as I was willing to lose, because there’s a low chance for this strategy to go poorly very quickly.

    I made enough money to pay for the entire trip, and then I never gambled again for the rest of my life. So that’s my story of how I came out ahead.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 minutes ago

      Gambling is like alcohol, some is fun but you need to learn your limits.

      If you go into gambling thinking ‘I’m gonna make 100 dollars!’ you’re gambling wrong. If you go into gambling thinking ‘I’m gonna spend 100 dollars.’ you’re gambling correctly.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        That’s exactly how I treated my trip. “This trip is going to cost 400 dollars and not a penny more.” The fact that it didn’t was just a happy coincidence.

  • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The only gambling I do is buying lottery tickets when I’m having the worst urges to kill myself. A little trick to wait just a bit longer. “You can wait until you get the results, it’s only couple days”, and then the worst urge manages to pass in that time. It’s pretty pathetic

    • Impractical_Island@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I make ass, reel good ads to, like this one! All the curious soles want to cum to my island, not associated wit other well-know islands

    • bridgeburner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Boomers with too much time amd money, cos they could afford to retire at 50 and still have enough money to waste on stupid things

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I was going to ignore this but God I really hate the ignorance in this statement. I’m genx. Gambling affects everyone. There are plenty of kids and teenagers and christ that’s who’s being targeted.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          Yeah - the old, retired people wasting money on slots is definitely a thing, but another side of the market are people who are desperate and don’t see any way of elevating themselves out of poverty except to win big.

          And gambling companies are 100% willing to take advantage of those people and take whatever they have.

        • ForeverComical@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Yeah boomer hate is in vogue, we would have thought only boomers would get distracted from class wars by gen wars.

        • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Exactly, they’re trying to get the new generations as interested as the ones on the way out. It’s addictive and now there’s algorithms to make you ‘win’ just enough to stay hooked. That combined with being able to gamble on more than stocks, there’s bound to be a huge shift either direction.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think it’s because it’s much more visible in boomers as they’re more likely to be gambling in casinos whereas I’d bet (ha) the majority of betting is online these days.

          Go into any casino and see what the age distribution is, in my experience the majority are boomers.

    • Impractical_Island@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I never knew gamlering like some but I know it is in my brain, as when I ate out of garbage in homeless i was like “each one is scratch offer” and so it was like tickets evety time I look in can

  • nightlily@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The most risk I ever take with my money is an indexed investment fund and even that feels a bit much at the moment.

  • Impractical_Island@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I feel a simlar way in that when the police are always taking it in itself, watching, seeting me up, and so I have to walk through the minefield exploding below when I walk pass the middle school I live here next to on everyday. Soneyime multiple time a day. It such!

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    wrong text on the picture. that one should read: “getting 200+ gambling ads daily while having the gambling gene and not gambling anyway.”

    The picture that goes with the original text would be someone not even noticing the bullets flying and missing.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s showing how it feels not how it is. It likely doesn’t feel that good having to constantly resist an urge like that.

      Also, the oblivious guy being missed by everything would be the ad blocker, not the non-gambler.

  • SlippiHUD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I probably dont have the gene, but I dont feel cool for not clicking an ad. What I mostly feel is rage that the promotions are so obviously geared towards getting the potentially addicted to try it by offering $100’s of free (bonus) bets.

    And at the end they have the audacity to mention a helpline.

    • ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure they’re legally required to display the helpline. No idea how the requirement has survived the current U.S. admin so far, but if these companies had their way, their victims would not be getting help

  • Rusty@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    If you know the basics of probability theory, you can calculate the expected value in most of the games. For roulette with two zeros, the expected value of your win is 95% of your bet, so it doesn’t make any sense.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I was down in winter once and decided I’d try out the whole gambling thing. Put 50 into some website and lost it all on a shit game.

    Why do people get addicted to that? I experienced no joy and the outcome was exactly what I expected.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The good sites will give you a little bit of your money back so it doesn’t seem like complete bull shit and have a lot of “near misses” too.

      It can also prey on desperate people who might not usually try gambling but maybe feel like it’s their best option at the time.

      • magnue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I won a tiny bit on the first game (like £10 up maybe) but at no point did I believe that a game of odds would possibly allow me to win anything meaningful.

        I would equate the experience to burning a £50 note.

      • nightlily@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        But if you’re even the slightest bit aware of statistics, near misses are exactly the same as complete misses. Seems strange that anyone educated falls for it. Desperation I can understand, especially these days when traditional ways of building wealth are almost as bad as just leaving cash under your mattress.

    • baines@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      stupid, the answer is stupid

      at least my gambling comes with animated titty first!

    • Fleppensteyn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I tried the online poker thing a little bit. With friends IRL it’s fun but online it’s boring. People work it like it’s their job.

      I tried an IRL casino once, won a bunch of money on the first machine and I was thinking I’m done, but had to wait for my friends so I kept doubling a small bet on black on roulette. It landed on red 9 times in a row. It’s all a scam

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The Martingale system is the definitive example of gambler’s fallacy. There’s definitely a “smart” way to gamble, but it generally requires games with a skill element, which casinos specifically avoid for this reason.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Sometimes I’m scrolling through Twitch.tv and come across the virtual casina category. Always some streams with people doing some random slot machine game and raving about it. I understand nothing about it.

      • magnue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ve heard a lot of the times the odds are stacked in the streamers favour. It’s worth the hit for the casino to get people to join.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It feels very sadening and worrying about the current state of society.