A bunch of people on the right have progressive ideas, they just either don’t care about them as much as they care about their regressive ones, or they don’t see them as “progressive”.
And these people, are they “on The Right” because they’ve already been othered by The Left? See, I myself have been accused of being a “right wing nazi chud” only a day or two ago in another thread on this same topic. To the nut case accusing me, it didn’t matter that I consistently vote Democrat and consistently vote against right-wing ballot measures, for instance I voted against NC HB2 “The Bathroom Bill” in 2016. Didn’t matter. Nut case accused the entire Democratic party of right wingedness along with me. Which means in this person’s eyes there’s no ACTUAL political action I can take that will put me on their side, I’m discarded as an enemy for the crime of being okay with Andy Weir. My irredeemable sin? Labeling terminally online gender obsessed leftists “bluehairs” to contrast them with far right “skinheads.” As thought crimes go, that one’s a capital offense.
I see this as a “it’s unclear where you stand” and I think that’s valid because to exist in modern America and not think your art is political makes you stupid or republican and I don’t think he’s stupid.
Grammatically speaking, I think this sentence has rabies. I think what you mean is, all art is political, and if you don’t think so you’re Republican or stupid. Okay, if all art is political, what statement is being made by the creator of this:
I’ve seen that assertion made a lot in the backlash to Weir appearing on Critical Drinker’s show. “Everything’s political, especially Sci-Fi.” Bullshit. Sci-fi is a useful venue for exploring ethical dilemmas, granted, but what law says that’s what it must be used for? Who the fuck are you to tell me what I can and can’t mean while writing fiction? Andy Weir uses accurate science for world and story building. By his own admission, he’s not a good enough writer to come up with the climactic “Do I continue to Earth and survive, or do I sacrifice myself to save Rocky?” dilemma; that was derived from the astrophage lifecycle. Sometimes the curtains are fucking blue.
I’m more willing to buy the premise…have you ever heard it said that all works of art are unintentional period pieces? Like, Amadeus is set in 1830, but it’s a very 1980’s movie? Part of that is reflecting the political character of its creators. So what of Andy Weir’s character do you see reflected in his works?
At the end of the day I don’t think he’s as harmful as JK Rowling,
JK Rowling significantly funds anti-trans organizations and causes. Andy Weir’s charitable contributions include The Planetary Society, the National Air and Space Museum and Space Center Houston, all to promote space exploration and STEM education. He’s done fundraisers for Marie Curie, a cause in the UK supporting people living with terminal illnesses. Based on what he actually does, I’m pretty okay with the man.
See?
And these people, are they “on The Right” because they’ve already been othered by The Left? See, I myself have been accused of being a “right wing nazi chud” only a day or two ago in another thread on this same topic. To the nut case accusing me, it didn’t matter that I consistently vote Democrat and consistently vote against right-wing ballot measures, for instance I voted against NC HB2 “The Bathroom Bill” in 2016. Didn’t matter. Nut case accused the entire Democratic party of right wingedness along with me. Which means in this person’s eyes there’s no ACTUAL political action I can take that will put me on their side, I’m discarded as an enemy for the crime of being okay with Andy Weir. My irredeemable sin? Labeling terminally online gender obsessed leftists “bluehairs” to contrast them with far right “skinheads.” As thought crimes go, that one’s a capital offense.
Grammatically speaking, I think this sentence has rabies. I think what you mean is, all art is political, and if you don’t think so you’re Republican or stupid. Okay, if all art is political, what statement is being made by the creator of this:
I’ve seen that assertion made a lot in the backlash to Weir appearing on Critical Drinker’s show. “Everything’s political, especially Sci-Fi.” Bullshit. Sci-fi is a useful venue for exploring ethical dilemmas, granted, but what law says that’s what it must be used for? Who the fuck are you to tell me what I can and can’t mean while writing fiction? Andy Weir uses accurate science for world and story building. By his own admission, he’s not a good enough writer to come up with the climactic “Do I continue to Earth and survive, or do I sacrifice myself to save Rocky?” dilemma; that was derived from the astrophage lifecycle. Sometimes the curtains are fucking blue.
I’m more willing to buy the premise…have you ever heard it said that all works of art are unintentional period pieces? Like, Amadeus is set in 1830, but it’s a very 1980’s movie? Part of that is reflecting the political character of its creators. So what of Andy Weir’s character do you see reflected in his works?
JK Rowling significantly funds anti-trans organizations and causes. Andy Weir’s charitable contributions include The Planetary Society, the National Air and Space Museum and Space Center Houston, all to promote space exploration and STEM education. He’s done fundraisers for Marie Curie, a cause in the UK supporting people living with terminal illnesses. Based on what he actually does, I’m pretty okay with the man.