MF couldn’t even write his own bullshit article of lies. There are three sections of bullet points, but the third is numbered for some reason.
The writing is manipulative, the points are partial to full lies. This whole thing sucks. I can’t believe I took time out of my morning to read this drivel.
There are three sections of bullet points, but the third is numbered for some reason.
The third one is the footnotes. That’d be the reason.
Personally I didn’t clock the article as slop; having footnotes in the first place is a credit towards that.
I’ll have to wait until I’m back home to give a proper reply, but the article reads really poorly.
Protecting the welfare of humanity is hardly a conservative ideal these days.
A lot of negativity surrounding this attempt.
The dishonesty involved shouldn’t be met with such derision by insinuations that it is the comparison of left and right that is wrong, rather than the whole concept of left and right that is to blame.
Conservatives are protecting pedophiles. They are not credible people
Release the Epstein files!
I am not anti ai but that article title is so dumb
I see sloppy slop-shilling, I downvote it.
I know and love the general threadiverse pushback against big tech bullshit, of which AI is a monstrously overgrown appendage, but I do wish it wasn’t quite so militant in cases like this post. It’s not mindless AI boosting (it’s not AI boosting at all – the author directly states they’re ambivalent about AI), it’s a genuine expression of opinions that I think are, if nothing else, interesting.
I don’t think it deserves to be downvoted. But I’d love to hear people’s counterarguments.
Absolute drivel.
