Dude, do you realize how fucking long 5000 words is? That’s approximately 11 pages with 12-point font single-spaced – consisting, to emphasize, of just words. That would represent an overwhelming majority of pages that people are reading and is well beyond a “long page”. If this is your attempt to make fun of the feature’s limitations, you’ve actually instead surprised me that they allow this much.
Mind as well that your cited limitation is more to do with on-board processing power than “the LLM will probably fuck it up”. Which are connected, sure – more sophisticated, resource-intensive models tend to do better. But that’s not really apples-to-apples with what they were talking about.
I don’t know if this particular sidebar handles it, but AI summaries of youtube videos save a huge amount of time. Especially when I’m only interested in one specific bit that’s buried somewhere in an hour of other stuff.
Why would someone want a page summarized?
If it’s short, just read it.
If it’s long, the LLM will probably fuck it up.
They’re really going after the illiterate and lazy segment.
We can actually say pretty concretely that a long page cannot be summed up by the LLM, because that is a limitation Mozilla themselves disclosed!
If only there were ways to skim or scan text to get an idea of what it says.
Dude, do you realize how fucking long 5000 words is? That’s approximately 11 pages with 12-point font single-spaced – consisting, to emphasize, of just words. That would represent an overwhelming majority of pages that people are reading and is well beyond a “long page”. If this is your attempt to make fun of the feature’s limitations, you’ve actually instead surprised me that they allow this much.
Mind as well that your cited limitation is more to do with on-board processing power than “the LLM will probably fuck it up”. Which are connected, sure – more sophisticated, resource-intensive models tend to do better. But that’s not really apples-to-apples with what they were talking about.
I don’t know if this particular sidebar handles it, but AI summaries of youtube videos save a huge amount of time. Especially when I’m only interested in one specific bit that’s buried somewhere in an hour of other stuff.
It doesn’t, and YouTube already has an AI-free way of finding stuff in videos. It’s called the transcript.
The transcript is what the AI would be basing its summary off of.
Many of those transcripts are, themselves, generated by AI.
Facedeer, don’t be a troll. You know that when people criticize AI, they aren’t talking about speech-to-text .
Oh, it’s you again.
I see you don’t want to talk about how people use words like “AI” in real life. Noted.
And don’t pretend to be surprised. You were just complaining about me a day ago. Try less AI shilling/trolling.
I can see the appeal but I wouldn’t trust it.
Related thought: I despise how much stuff is made into video when a few paragraphs, maybe with a gif, would do just fine.