• cRazi_man@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      How? How can people tell? Someone points this out for most content posted. It seems like a race to be the first to say “AI slop”. Between actual AI slop, and content accused of being AI slop; there really isn’t much content left to be able to enjoy online.

        • Siethron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s not called slop because it’s ugly. It’s called slop BECAUSE it’s AI which is a sloppy waste of resources. People sloppily rely on it too much causing their brains to go to slop. Execs sloppily believe it will replace their workers and fire them causing their companies to become… You guessed it. Slop.

      • besmtt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I wasn’t considering the joke. I zoomed in on the face and those wrinkles looked suspicious to me. Then I started looking at the background and that’s when I started thinking the image was slop? ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        Oh and the ears too. They just don’t seem realistic to me.

        • gnutrino@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 minutes ago

          So basically we’re back to the days of “I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time” but with AI instead of photoshop? Makes me feel all nostalgic

        • troybot@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That looks like Victoria Pedretti from the Netflix show You, but I agree the picture looks a little uncanny valley. It could be the picture was taken with a phone camera pointed at a tv?