• CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    What would they gain from that? Insurance won’t cover lost income from a dysfunctional satellite. Also pretty sure if you could get insurance it’d be extremely expensive for a launch on an unproven rocket.

        • Nighed@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It’s a numbers game on rocket reliability. You pay slightly more for your launch, but if it goes bang, you get a big cheque from the insurance.

          For the known launchers, their reliability is pretty known, and newer (or recently exploded) launchers often give cheap/free launches while they are effectively testing things - helps make up for the pricy insurance.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              That’s literally what insurance is. They bet bad thing doesn’t happen. If it does, they pay you. If it doesn’t, they keep their money plus what you paid them.

            • athatet@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Because it’s profitable? I typed “space insurance” into google and it gave me webpages for companies who offer space insurance.

              Why would you think that it wouldn’t be a thing?

              • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                I didn’t say it’s not a thing. I’m saying what would be the point of using it for fraud? You don’t make money from a failed launch.