EDIT: A rough timeline of events here:
  1. In 2024, a user noticed this odd traffic on their local network, took a screenshot of the graph, and posted it to Twitter
  2. After discussing the issue with other Twitter users, the original poster realized that this graph was actually a mistake with their router or something. This reporting software was reporting some other device’s network traffic as being the washing machine’s traffic. The washing machine was actually only using a reasonable amount of data.
  3. Despite this past revelation, in 2026, someone put together a “meme” of sorts comparing the supposed events in that 2024 graph to what people in the past had predicted the future to be.
  4. For whatever reason, that “meme” was put through AI post-processing of some sort. Was the attempt to “upscale” this image after it had been passed around and been automatically compressed down by various platforms? Or was it someone using some newfangled AI-assisted compression technique in an attempt to create a smaller file size than any of the more traditional compression techniques? No idea. Whatever reason was, the image was left with a bunch of nonsense text on the graph portion.
  5. I saw this “meme” and decided to share it here without scrutinizing the text on the graph. As mentioned in my first point, this graph was originally posted years ago, so I was already familiar with it and did not feel the need to read into it in the image I was sharing. I felt safe assuming it was just the same graph that I remember seeing years back.
  6. After users here called out the nonsense text, I just recreated the “meme” from scratch. I grabbed the original screenshot of the graph from Twitter and a stock photo of clouds, and then combined them along with some text so that this is more-or-less the same exact “meme”, just without the AI gibberish.
  • Kyle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Pretty disappointed in Lemmy not noticing and downvoting this AI slop.

    I’m all for calling out bullshit IoT garbage but zoom in and look closer.

    Update: op updated the photo with a non AI image that’s the same but without hallucinated text. The original graph was real and made by a human, but through memes got degraded and an AI upscaler added new hallucinated text to it. Mystery solved and fixed.

      • Kyle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Lovely_reader doing the real investigative journalism here, I love it ☺️

        So yes it’s ai slopified, but it is also a real graph that didn’t need to be slopified but was done so using AI upscaling.

        So, everyone is right in a way fun twist 😅

    • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      For a while, I carefully scrutinized every image for signs of AI

      Now, I’ve decided to not bother with a close examination unless it’s important for some reason. There’s not enough time in the day

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I always notice and downvote the ai slop but here I don’t see the patterns?

      Also I think I saw this graph from more than a year ago

      Edit: op replaced the ai slop graph with the original one so that’s why I didn’t see the garbled text

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I mean, if you zoom in and actually read the text, it very quickly becomes noticeable as fake

        Look at the numbers on the scale. Look at the “Downloaid” numbers. Look at the fact that “Syert” is apparently a data unit.

        Or how about the fact that something apparently managed to “Uploaid” 97.70 Bytes? Not KB. Not MB. Bytes. You can’t upload .7 bytes, because a byte isn’t divisible by 10. A byte has 8 bits, so it is only measured in eighths. You could upload .625B, or .75B, but not .70B.

      • ptu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        On the day that’s between 31\ and 59, the scale that goes from 15poc to 301 000 is making up less Uploaid, of which the total is 53,8B Syert. Both totals are 3.66 GB

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s been around for several years. It’s probably been passed around so much that the image quality degraded and someone sharpened it with AI which disrupted the text.

          I saw this probably 6-7 years ago on reddit, the answer was that the appliance was attempting to download and install an update, then failing the update for some reason, so it was constantly re-downloading the patch all day.

          Nothing nefarious or AI slop (other that some crappy image correction) about this.

          • ptu@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Interesting. The image seems to have been fixed now, I didn’t know that’s possible. As for your theory, it would then show download traffic, not upload like seen here. I hope the washing machine got fixed too.

    • athatet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      True however it could be ai upscaling. I seem to remember this post or at least something similar.