return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoLeak Shows ICE Planning to Use Facial Recognition Glasses to Identify Targets in Real Timefuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1515cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlworld@quokk.auprivacy@programming.devusa@midwest.social
arrow-up1515external-linkLeak Shows ICE Planning to Use Facial Recognition Glasses to Identify Targets in Real Timefuturism.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square85fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlworld@quokk.auprivacy@programming.devusa@midwest.social
minus-squareundrwater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up89·3 days agoWill they care / understand about false positives? Not likely.
minus-squarecrandlecan@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·3 days agoAs long as they kill p. of c., it’ll be deemed legal 🫡🤢
minus-squareempireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·3 days agoTheir “facial recognition” ends up just being a binary switch on a light detector
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 days agoTook me waaaaay longer than it should have to realize “p. of c.” means “people of color”. Still haven’t figured out if you’re censoring it, or if you think p. of c. is a faster way to abbriviate it. Either way, that “shorthand” is stupid, and you should just write it out.
minus-squareturtlesareneat@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 days agoFolks who work in social justice will know the acronym “POC” but “p. of c.” I don’t usually encounter. Are we sure it’s not “prince of caspian?”
minus-squareIratePirate@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoNaw, it’s price of coffee. It’s way too high and needs to be brought down.
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@hilariouschaos.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoI’m pretty sure ice is more diverse than every single protest against them.
minus-squarefrongt@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 days agoYou don’t need to ask about likelihood. It’s already been shown they don’t: https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/more-than-a-dozen-wrongful-arrests-due-to-police-reliance-on-facial-recognition-technology
minus-squareFlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-23 days agoRemember 20 years ago when Wikileaks was telling us about all the false positives swept up in the War on Terror dragnet? Both Bush and Obama got reelected. No one at the federal level gives a shit.
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoImagine they would at the very least have some sort of double check procedure like a skin color chart they could reference if there was any question.
Will they care / understand about false positives?
Not likely.
Feature, not bug.
As long as they kill p. of c., it’ll be deemed legal 🫡🤢
Their “facial recognition” ends up just being a binary switch on a light detector
Took me waaaaay longer than it should have to realize “p. of c.” means “people of color”.
Still haven’t figured out if you’re censoring it, or if you think p. of c. is a faster way to abbriviate it.
Either way, that “shorthand” is stupid, and you should just write it out.
Folks who work in social justice will know the acronym “POC” but “p. of c.” I don’t usually encounter.
Are we sure it’s not “prince of caspian?”
Naw, it’s price of coffee. It’s way too high and needs to be brought down.
You’ve got my vote
I’m pretty sure ice is more diverse than every single protest against them.
You don’t need to ask about likelihood. It’s already been shown they don’t: https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/more-than-a-dozen-wrongful-arrests-due-to-police-reliance-on-facial-recognition-technology
Remember 20 years ago when Wikileaks was telling us about all the false positives swept up in the War on Terror dragnet?
Both Bush and Obama got reelected. No one at the federal level gives a shit.
Imagine they would at the very least have some sort of double check procedure like a skin color chart they could reference if there was any question.