• rainwall@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    They could just have easily built in the ublock origin plugin and not gone with braves implementation, a browser that is plagued with justified scandal.

    Why Firefox would tie its fate to its disgraced founder is beyond me.

      • rainwall@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Sure, so they should have used some of that AI cash to rebuild ublock origin in rust, or push it further along the path to web assembly its already on.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The code is literally right there for the taking. Why would they spend the time rebuilding something when they could just have it for free?

          • rainwall@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Because then they would have something better and would have improved one of the most popular extensions in their browser?

      • rainwall@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Hes also a bigot that was removed from leadership at Mozilla that has run multiple scams via Brave, all while taking Thiel bucks. What’s your point?

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          i think i misunderstood your earlier reply, i thought you were talking about eich as the founder of brave, but you meant that he was the founder of firefox.

          yeah he sucks.

          i don’t think he wrote the adblocker though.