what, in general, like taking out your appendix? or just exterior, like removing a breast to treat cancer? or just cosmetic, like fixing a broken nose? or gender-affirming, like a fat guy getting top surgery? or gender-affirming as the medically approved cure specifically for dysphoria?
where is the line that makes it disturbing?
let’s make them enjoy it less
and that’s before we get to AMP, where google will 1) outright refuse to show pages that don’t follow their guidelines, and 2) just copy the content from those pages to display themselves because the guidelines are designed to make the copying easier for them.
you know i’m fine with whatever fetishes, i just don’t want them doing that stuff when i’m around.
no, it was the base model. i think they’re limited to 180km/h.
everyone if suddenly in this scenario:
i got to witness this with two double-trailer log carriers once, they were jockeying for position at 90km/h while i was trying to get past. now this was my first time in the company tesla model 3 (this was in 2017) and i just wanted to get past so i waited for an opening and floored it. after i had cleared them i looked down at the speedometer and i was doing 170. it didn’t feel any different to doing 90. super weird experience considering i’d managed to make myself car sick a few minutes earlier when accelerating from 40 to 100 on the onramp.
1.1 and forward is night and day, yeah.
i mean in comparison to other open cad applications.
based on what metric?
oh also the openaec foundation endorsement means literally nothing, they didn’t exist three months ago, their website is all vibecoded, and they linkjacked the name of an existing organisation with the same name incorporated in japan.
reminder that the villain of cars 2 is famous for being “the first car to circumnavigate the globe without gps”.
also jesus was obviously a Model ✝️
i’m assuming the cars universe equivalent of grocery stores are gas stations.
*sigh* i guess it’s time for this again…
Kill James Bond Highlights: “The horrific implications of Cars 2 (part 5)” (the Popemobile bit)
Edit: There’s a real good comment by youtube user CleverCrumbish on one of the highlights:
So, the thing about Cars 2 right.
In Cars the plot of the film revolves very tightly around the idea that the way people live in the modern age (and particularly the way they transport themselves) is incentivised to progress and develop toward alienating those people from communities that live in and on the places they move through and that those changes are causing suffering as adherents to or prisoners of the old ways of doing things are left behind and underserved. Because this is a theme explained through the parallels between motor racing and the older rural automotive landscape, that is, because most of the metaphor the film is using concerns the automobile, it makes sense to simplify the framing for a children’s cartoon and make all the characters cars.
In Cars 2 every character is a car for absolutely no fucking reason whatsoever except that they were in the first movie and it would be weird to change it now.
maybe because it’s not true, at least if what the ex-head writer said on bsky is to be believed.
serious answer: they don’t know how to prompt. not that knowing how to prompt makes it look better, but it can at least make it look different. like how google used to give you more specific results if you formulated the query in a certain way.
the main author.
i know there was that doctor on antarctica who had to remove their own appendix, but i wouldn’t be surprised if people have done all the others too.