• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 days ago

    Kit was created by a team of people, not generated by AI. And Kit isn’t an AI assistant or a chatbot.

    Glad they cleared that up right away. The only mentions of AI are practically apologies, which is a good sign. I guess bullying works.

    In the end, we agreed that Kit isn’t a fox nor a red panda. Kit is a Firefox, its own creature — with attributes from both a fox and a red panda, and perhaps a little fire magic.

    This feels like it’s for the kind of demographic that the platonic ideal of Firefox should represent.

  • zener_diode@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    2 days ago

    To all the people who read neither the article, nor the other comments pointing it out:

    This is NOT an AI chatbot!

    And I think it’s a great idea! And Kit looks cute!

    Maybe Mozilla finally noticed that most Firefox users are not all that enthusiastic about AI and would rather see development on other parts of Firefox.

  • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m really happy to see a piece of news about “… your companion for …” and it not being about yet another soulless LLM chatbot.

  • ByteMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I like this. Let’s make the internet a bit more fun again, everything is cold and soulless nowadays

    • Statick@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah this is great. KDE has had Konqi and Katie forever. I like that Firefox is getting it’s own mascot as well.

      • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I absolutely LOVE their modern designs. The early Konqi 3D model design was just straight up ugly, IMO.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      I understand the reference and know the source, so I’ll second you on that.

      But… It was K.I.T.T.

    • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      This isn’t an AI. Kit is just the name of their redesigned mascot. They literally said in the article that it wasn’t designed with AI and isn’t an AI chatbot.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      as much as llms suck. if I had the money, I’d restore a 1982 Pontiac firebird and it an llm with a voice model based on kit. that can control the infotainment and had access to the car’s odb and other functions.

      all running on a gpu inside the car. using a local model

      • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If it’s a locally running model trained from ethically sourced data, you’d already be doing better than 99.9% of the piece of shit techbro CEOs out there even if it barely could turn the radio on…

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I want Kit stickers for my laptop. I will pay for them. Mozilla please take my money and give me adorable stickers.

  • fuzzyfirefox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    At one point, we asked ourselves whether or not Kit should look more like a red panda (leading to a brief detour into red panda references).

    In the end, we agreed that Kit isn’t a fox nor a red panda. Kit is a Firefox, its own creature — with attributes from both a fox and a red panda, and perhaps a little fire magic.

    Just my 2 cents, but since Red Pandas are endangered, I would have preferred that the made Kit a Red Panda.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    i miss the cute animal sketches they used on error pages a few years ago. like the confused little dinosaur with the map.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Great, how much money was wasted on this thing that’s not an essential part of a 100% standards-compliant browser?

    Because that’s what Firefox needs to be. That’s all it should ever have been.

    • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      So you want a browser nobody uses?

      Or do you want a browser with a good ux? Because this is part of a good ux.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        As long as it’s driven by open standards and not DoubleClick’s monetization plans, I’m of the mindset that either the users will find it, or else those who care need to build a new and different network that’s actively toxic to advertising.

        UX is a secondary concern after decrapifying the engine and the browser and making the browser an actual user agent, rather than a virtual machine. Possibly even tertiary.