That is shitty food, food crime and a crime against humanity, all wrapped in a single gruesome package.

The mind behind the creation of this abomination is corrupted beyond any possibility of salvation.

A death is a death.

I can quote from memory a case in my country, in the 80’s, where a man assaulted a couple, killed the woman and was about to kill the man.

The killer got tackled and beat to death by the widower. The sole survivor was sent to trial for murder regardless being under mortal peril.

Got acquited on the appeal. First instance deemed it an excessive act, regardless self defence.

High-jacking the thread a bit.

As anyone tried Midori recently. I remembered about it this past weekend and when searching I was impressed with the project page.

Installed it on my phone and my computer.

On Android it is not ready yet. Maybe for tablets. The browser did not resize to fit the screen. It also felt heavy. Removed after a few tentative uses.

On PC, the same feeling of being heavy, slow moving. It took a long time to open and start navigating. My computer is not new but it carries itself well enough to start FF in a few seconds.

If that is what it takes to have my devices hacked and installed with Linux by penguins, that is a risk I’m willing to take.

If this is biggest danger of Antartica, book me a flight.

But then there is the obligation of preemptive apendectomy in order to go to Antarctica. And I try to avoid being stabed to life as I can possibly manage.

I am going to repeat my point as many times as necessary until it gets through: your example is only a punishment system with an extra layer to be more palatable to the society where it is inserted.

Being free does not imply in any moment an individual can do whatever they may concieve or desire; freedom requires and demands constraint, precisely because the freedom of the other is the boundary of my own. Life in society predicates on this. There is no society of one; the individual often finds a swift end if insisting on it, by its own actions.

A society that simply represses or discards individuals because they engaged in destructive behaviour is not doing anything to in fact solve a problem. A society is as responsible by its individuals as the individuals are by their society. And a society that so simply and easily opts by fractioning itself just to allow more (blatantly artificial) freedom to its elements is not a society. It is something I lack the word to describe but a society it is not.

That is a system predicated on getting rid of the problematic, like the one it exists today, just with an added layer of distancing, to ease the rest of the population’s mind. It does not solve any problem.

So what? It still exists on the web. People can visit you, enjoy your content. Make a stand.

Nobody. Unless you had the capability/knowledge/will to maintain your own instance, which makes your content and yourself unbreakable.

That doesn’t work. The average individual is too hedonistic to refrain from any pleasureable or self reinforcing loop. It’s been a cautionary tale in stories since ancient times.

If I didn’t understood there is already a problem of bad actors, I wouldn’t have approached your reply. And deny it in any way would be bad faith from me.

What I feel the need to underscore is that individuals make and influence groups and even the most progressively thought out environment is open to being corrupted if any individual present there lacks, in any way, the self awareness that their attitude is damaging.

It’s not the group that needs to regulate the individual; the regulation needs to arise from the individual themselves, in the first place. And most individuals lack that hard individual sense of responsability.

Before all that - and you are right on your take - there is a more basic flaw that affects social media: people do not know how to act properly.

The anonimity emboldens the small minds that use it to mistreat, slander and ridicule others and spread lies and rumours.

Unless we can force people to act with civility - which implies people being fairly conscious of the consequences of their words and actions - social media will remain what it is: a cesspool where the worst of our species destils into a refined poison.

Don’t. By the reasons you stated yourself. Say no. And if the option is to remain ignorant or unknowleadgeable then so be it, for the reasons you so eloquently put forward.

I understand your position, I respect your option, I did not downvote you but what I asked here exactly to have human feedback and perhaps spark some conversation on the movie.

The people that insulted you on the situation you related are wrong. And allowing that to go forward is allowing for human contact and relations to be devalued. Best answer for that kind of people is remembering them if they were always so knowledgeable and if they got their knowledge by themselves, alone.

Good films. Agree.

Thank you!

I think it’s the one. Thank you.

That is for corpses, not cabbages.

The saddest part on your comment was that Suse was my first distro and it did not register in my mind. As for Fedore, althoug I still insist calling it Red Hat.

Sarcasm died and left it’s place to be occupied by literalism. The most ridiculous things have become literal.