• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    It’s weird to see this much of a cover-up of the mismanagement of a nuclear facility while people insist we need to build more, bigger, and less regulated facilities.

    I wonder what the Polymarket on Chernobyl would have looked like if it existed back then.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Compared to Western, modern designs Chernobyl wasn’t regulated. That’s kind of the reason it became such a catastrophe.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          This is critical, it blew up during an unsanctioned test in which the director ordered safety protocols ignored.

          Nothing wrong with the design, the other three reactors have been working since then.

          • Rakonat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Everything was wrong with the design, from the control rods to the safety systems and overrides.

            Three Mile Island, which happened 6 years prior and even before Chernobyl unit 4 was first brought on line, would have automatically SCRAMed itself in the conditions that the operators of unit 4 put their reactor in. And infact, TMI did SCRAM itself to prevent runaway reactions when it had it’s accident, but a faulty indicators prevented operators from being aware a relief valve was locked open.

            All of the other RBMK designs were retrofitted in the final years of the USSR and following it’s collapse to rectify some of the design problems, but Russia is the only country that still operates the design. Ukraine and Lithuania decommissioned theirs by 2009.

    • hash@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Respectfully I think this is interesting conjecture. Intentionally or not, it seems to directly compare modern facilities with Chernobyl. The only factor linking the examples is nuclear. There’s an ocean of time, technology, politics, culture, and regulations between the two.